EU Inc. is the European Commission's proposed pan-European company form (COM/2026/321), currently being negotiated. The Societas Europaea (SE) is the EU's existing supranational company form, established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 and applicable since 8 October 2004. About 3,800 SEs are registered across the EU. Most are large public companies. For the EU Inc. explainer, see What is EU Inc..
Quick verdict
For founders setting up a startup or SME, the SE was never the right answer. €120,000 minimum capital, two-member-state requirement, and complex employee-participation negotiations mean the SE is structurally unsuitable for early-stage companies.
For a large public company seeking corporate-mobility advantages (the original SE use case), the SE remains a usable instrument and is well established. EU Inc. as proposed does not fully cover this use case yet.
EU Inc. is, in effect, the SE for everyone the SE was never built for. They are not direct competitors. They sit at different ends of the company-size spectrum.
Side-by-side
| Dimension | EU Inc. (proposed) | Societas Europaea (SE) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost to incorporate | Target under €100, no notary fee | €5,000–€20,000 typical legal and notary fees, before SE registration fees |
| Speed | Target under 48 hours | 6–12 months including employee-participation negotiations |
| Minimum share capital | Zero | €120,000 subscribed |
| Notary required | No, fully digital | Yes, multiple notarial steps depending on member state of registration |
| Cross-border requirement | None. Available to founders in any single EU country | Mandatory two-member-state nexus to incorporate (subsidiary, holding, merger, transformation) |
| Governance | EU regulation defines the framework, including share classes | Monistic or dualistic structure. National company law of registration applies for matters not covered by the SE Regulation |
| Cross-border recognition | Recognised by regulation in all 27 EU member states | Recognised by regulation in all 27 EU member states (and EEA states) |
| Digital incorporation | Digital-by-default, end-to-end | Largely paper, member-state dependent |
| Employee participation | National law applies (no EU-level participation regime in EU Inc.) | Mandatory negotiation under Directive 2001/86/EC. Special Negotiating Body required before registration |
| Stock options | EU-ESO with tax deferred to disposal event | Per national law of the SE's registered office |
| Status today | Proposal published 18 March 2026, not yet law | Available since 2004, ~3,800 SEs registered EU-wide |
Why the SE was never adopted by startups
The SE was designed in the 1980s and 1990s. The political compromises required to get it through, particularly the employee-participation rules and the €120,000 minimum capital, made it a niche instrument. Three structural problems:
Capital floor. €120,000 of subscribed share capital is a non-trivial commitment for an early-stage company. By the time most companies could justify it, they had grown out of the form's intended use case.
Two-member-state requirement. An SE cannot be formed by a single founder in a single country. It requires a cross-border element from incorporation: a holding SE over two national subsidiaries, a merger of two national companies, the transformation of an existing public limited company that has had a subsidiary in another member state for two years, or similar. This rules out the natural startup path of "incorporate first, expand later."
Employee-participation negotiations. Before an SE can register, a Special Negotiating Body of employee representatives must be formed and negotiations on employee involvement concluded (or fail and trigger fallback rules). For very small companies, this is procedurally enormous. For very large companies with works-council infrastructure, it is manageable.
The SE solved corporate-mobility problems for very large public companies, particularly through the cross-border-merger and seat-transfer mechanisms. It never reached SMEs, and was never going to.
What EU Inc. fixes
- Zero minimum share capital. The capital-floor problem is gone.
- No two-member-state requirement. A single founder in a single country can incorporate an EU Inc.
- Digital-by-default. Notary chase removed from the critical path.
- National employment and co-determination law applies as a matter of where the entity sits and where employees work. No special-negotiating-body procedure.
EU Inc. is also a regulation rather than a regulation-plus-directive package. The SE is governed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001 for the corporate-law parts, and by Directive 2001/86/EC for the employee-participation parts. National transposition of the directive varies. EU Inc. is meant to avoid that fragmentation by keeping everything in a single regulation.
Bottom line
The SE is not an EU Inc. replacement candidate for startups. It was never built for them. For large public companies, the SE may continue to be the right form for corporate-mobility transactions even after EU Inc. is law, because the SE is well established for that purpose. For everyone else, EU Inc. is what the SE should have been twenty years ago.
To get the launch email when EU Inc. is adopted, join the waitlist.
Sources
- EU Inc. proposal: COM/2026/321.
- SE Regulation: Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001.
- SE employee-participation directive: Council Directive 2001/86/EC.
- SE register data: European Trade Union Institute.
- Full source list on Sources.